TREACHER COLLINS SYNDROME:
GENETIC UPDATE

a publication of :
TREACHER COLLINS FOUNDATION

April 1996: Thank you for your interest in the genetics of Treacher Collins syndrome. The Treacher Collins Syndrome Collaborative Group (composed of the genetic research teams directed by Dr. Michael Dixon of the United Kingdom and Dr. John Wasmuth of the University of California, Irvine) discovered the location of the gene for Treacher Collins syndrome, Treacle. The information about this discovery appeared in the following article:

The Treacher Collins Syndrome Collaborative Group (1996). Positional cloning of a gene involved in the pathogenesis of Treacher Collins syndrome. Nature Genetics.

The following letter explains what this discovery means; it is reprinted from correspondence with Dr. Michael Dixon.

Should you need further information or have any questions, feel free to contact the Treacher Collins Foundation at the above location or the Alliance of Genetic Support Groups at:


It is with a great deal of excitement that I am writing to you, in that I am pleased to be able to let you know that a gene that is "faulty" in Treacher Collins syndrome has finally been identified. This is a very recent discovery that has arisen from a collaborative research project between members of both my own laboratory and that of Professor John Wasmuth at the University of California, Irvine, USA. I do so hope that despite the time that the research has taken, you will be pleased about what benefits this will have both in the short and longer term. Firstly, let me point out that there is, as always, still a lot of work that remains to be completed before we have a completely clear picture of how the gene works and what problems in the gene occur in people with Treacher Collins syndrome. Nevertheless, this work is on-going and we hope that we will continue to make progress in the research so that we can help to provide the best possible care and advice for families with Treacher Collins syndrome.

In terms of benefits that will result from the discovery, there are a number of points that I should like to make. Firstly, we will, in the fullness of time, be able to assess each family to see if the same gene is faulty in all families with Treacher Collins syndrome. Secondly, we hope to be able to perform more accurate diagnosis for a much greater percentage of families (this will apply to both pre- and post-natal diagnostic predictions.) This is slightly complicated by the fact that, to date, the fault in the gene is different in every family with Treacher Collins syndrome. This does not create a problem for those families where we have identified the fault, but will be more problematical in families where this remains unidentified, as it can take quite some time to track down the problem in any single family. This is one area where we are continuing to work very hard as we have only been able to identify the problem in a percentage of families to date. The potential for being able to make diagnostic predictions is, in my opinion, likely to have the most impact in confirming the clinical diagnosis in very mildly affected patients, where the features are very subtle and also in confirming that other people are unaffected. This will be helpful in providing more accurate genetic counselling.

Another area where this may well prove to be useful is where two unaffected parents have produced an affected child, which is thought to occur in approximately 60% of cases. Why is this important? In situations where the parents are truly unaffected, the risk of them having another affected child is very small, however, if one of the parents is so mildly affected that it is difficult/impossible to make a clinical diagnosis the risk of having a second affected child would be much highter (50:50) for each and every pregnancy. Again, genetic testing may be able to help in providing genetic counselling for those families who are interested in this option. I think that it is also extremely important to point out that we still will NOT be able to make any prediction about the severity of Treacher Collins syndrome in any individual. We are obviously happy to help out in any way we can, however, I feel that it is important that any help that we can give be coupled with similar help from local clinical geneticists and genetic counsellors, so that you are able to more fully discuss any concerns that you may have.

In terms of other benefits that may occur in the longer term, we are now able to investigate other conditions which resemble Treacher Collins syndrome in some way (e.g., Nager, Miller and "first arch" syndromes), to see if they result from problems in the same gene. This is probably a "long-shot", but is certainly worth pursuing. In addition, research into the function of this gene during development of the ear and the face will improve our understanding of the formation of these tissues and will provide important information on the problems in Treacher Collins syndrome.

I am aware that this discovery does raise a number of ethical questions, however, I feel that if we work together in a careful and sensitive way, these issues are by no means insurmountable. There is still an enormous amount of work to be done before many of these benefits will be fully realised, nevertheless, this is clearly a very important and significant breakthrough. I realise that many of you will have questions/concerns about the discovery of this gene and you may feel that you would like to discuss things in more detail. I should be happy to talk with anybody at greater length if they feel that they would like to phone me on the number below. Early evening is the best time to reach me as I am more likely to be in my office. If you would like to talk with somebody other than myself or your local geneticist/counsellor, Hope Charkins has kindly agreed to act as a contact person for families from the USA.

Thank you for taking the time to read this letter.

With best wishes.

Yours sincerely,

Michael Dixon

School of Biological Sciences Phone/Fax:

TCF GENETIC UPDATE 3 APRIL 1996

Diagnostic Predictions and the Treacher Collins Syndrome Gene

by Michael J. Dixon, B.D.S., Ph.D.

School of Biological Sciences, University of Manchester (U.K.)

The recent discovery of the gene that causes Treacher Collins syndrome has made possible more accurate diagnosis for a much greater percentage of families with a history of Treacher Collins syndrome (this will apply to both pre- and post-natal diagnostic predictions.)

Prenatal testing

Parents who are thinking about having additional children are often interested in prenatal testing for a variety of reasons - not least of which is allowing for improved medical care at delivery if another child with Treacher Collins syndrome is born. If you are concerned that future children might have Treacher Collins syndrome, prenatal testing may be available. In this regard, the Manchester team is happy to help out in any way that we possibly can, however, we feel that it is essential that any help we can provide be coupled with similar help from clinical geneticists and genetic counsellors. This will ensure that you are able to more fully discuss any concerns that you may have and will also ensure that ethical standards are maintained. For those families who are thinking about prenatal testing it would be advisable to consult a clinical geneticist prior to becoming pregnant. The information that follows is an outline of what is becoming available.

Prenatal testing is a possibility for families with a history of Treacher Collins syndrome and would ideally be achieved from a chorionic villus sample (CVS.) Information on the timing of CVS is best obtained from your clinical geneticist/counsellor. While the discovery of the Treacher Collins syndrome gene will make this test more accurate than ever before, diagnosis is complicated by the fact that, to date, the disruption in the gene is different in every family with Treacher Collins syndrome that we have examined. This does not create a problem for those families where the disruption has been identified, but will be more problematical in families where this remains unidentified. This is because the disruption in the gene has to be located before it is possible to undertake prenatal diagnosis and it may take quite some time to track down the problem in any single family. The ideal thing from our own point of view would be to analyse samples from parents who were interested in genetic diagnosis well in advance of a potential pregnancy. This way time would work for, rather than against, us.

It is also extremely important to stress that it will still NOT be possible to make any prediction about how mildly or severely affected a child might be. In this regard, high resolution ultrasonography can also detect features of Treacher Collins syndrome prenatally, but usually not before twenty weeks of pregnancy. You should consult a radiologist who is experienced in visualizing the eyes, jaws, chin, ears, etc. Ultrasonography, however, is not a definitive diagnostic procedure and a fetus with mild features might not be detected. The way to proceed might be to use the two tests in conjunction with one another and this is another area in which it is advisable to seek advice.

Postnatal diagnosis

The potential for being able to make diagnostic predictions is also likely to have a large impact in confirming the clinical diagnosis in very mildly affected patients, where the features are very subtle and also in confirming that other people are unaffected. This will be helpful in providing more accurate genetic counselling. Another area where this may well prove to be useful is where two unaffected parents have produced an affected child, which is thought to occur in approximately 60% of cases. Why is this important? In situations where the parents are truly unaffected, the risk of them having another affected child is very small, however, if one of the parents is so mildly affected that it is difficult/impossible to make a clinical diagnosis, the risk of having a second affected child would be much higher (50:50) for each and every pregnancy. Again, genetic testing may be able to help in providing genetic counselling for those families who are interested in this option.

TREACHER COLLINS FOUNDATION:

POSITION STATEMENT ON GENETIC DISCOVERIES

IN TREACHER COLLINS SYNDROME

The gene for Treacher Collins syndrome, Treacle, was discovered in 1995 by The Treacher Collins Syndrome Collaborative Group, composed of the genetic research teams of Dr. Michael Dixon of the University of Manchester, United Kingdom, and Dr. John Wasmuth of the University of California, Irvine, U.S.A. Treacher Collins syndrome is a craniofacial anomaly. It is caused by a gene mutation that is, so far, different in every family. The mutation occurs before conception affecting one out of every 10,000 live births.

With the discovery of this gene, accurate diagnosis of Treacher Collins syndrome in a person is now possible with a blood test. Reliable pre-natal testing can also be performed at the time when the Chorionic Villus Sampling (CVS) can be performed. A genetic professional can offer guidelines about the timing of the CVS. Pre-natal testing can only indicate whether the fetus carries the gene; it cannot determine how mildly or severely affected the fetus might be. For those families who are thinking about pre-natal testing, it would be advisable to consult a clinical geneticist prior to becoming pregnant.

As with many genetic discoveries, scientific recognition of the gene for Treacher Collins syndrome, brings ethical, legal and social implications to the forefront. The Treacher Collins Foundation will facilitate discussion about these issues and continue to be a clearinghouse to individuals, families, professionals and the public for information and support regarding Treacher Collins syndrome. While the Treacher Collins Foundation will offer referrals to the genetic research groups studying Treacher Collins syndrome and genetic professionals local to the inquirer, it is not our intent to offer genetic counseling or serve as a replacement for genetic counseling.

The Treacher Collins Foundation thanks Susan Hayflick, M.D. at Oregon Health Sciences University, professional advisor to TCF, for reviewing this document, "TCF Genetic Update."